Self-Insured Clients Using TPAs

TPA - Third Party Administrator

As an adjuster, handling claims for self-insured clients using TPAs presents unique challenges and opportunities. This configuration differs significantly from traditional insurance arrangements, and understanding these differences is crucial for effective claims management.

Adjusting Claims for Self-Insured Clients Using TPAs: Essential Guidelines

by
Sheryl Thompson
Senior Claims and Compliance Specialist

Here’s what you need to know when working with self-insured clients using TPAs:

1. Understanding the Roles

In the context of self-insured clients using TPAs, there are three main parties involved:

  • Self-Insured Client: The company that bears the financial risk for claims.
  • TPA: The organization managing the claims process on behalf of the self-insured client.
  • You, the Adjuster: Working on behalf of the TPA to investigate and settle claims for self-insured clients using TPAs.

Key Differences:

  • You’re not representing an insurance company, but rather the self-insured client via the TPA.
  • Decision-making processes for self-insured clients may involve more stakeholders than in traditional insurance scenarios.

2. Financial Considerations for Self-Insured Clients Using TPAs

Claim Reserves

  • Unlike with traditional insurers, claim reserves directly impact the balance sheet of self-insured clients.
  • Be prepared to provide more detailed justifications for your reserve recommendations.

Settlement Authority

  • Settlement authority limits may be lower when dealing with self-insured clients using TPAs, requiring more frequent communication for approvals.
  • The TPA may have different levels of authority granted by self-insured clients for different types of claims.

3. Reporting Requirements

Frequency

  • Reporting for self-insured clients using TPAs is often more frequent and detailed than with traditional insurance.
  • Be prepared to provide regular (sometimes weekly) claim status updates.

Customization

  • Self-insured clients using TPAs often have unique reporting requirements tailored to their industry or risk profile.
  • Familiarize yourself with any client-specific reporting templates or systems.

4. Client-Specific Policies and Procedures

Handling Guidelines

  • Each self-insured client using a TPA may have their own specific claims handling guidelines.
  • These guidelines might differ significantly from standard insurance industry practices.

Industry-Specific Considerations

  • Be aware of any industry-specific regulations or best practices that apply to your self-insured clients using TPAs.

5. Medicare Compliance Considerations

MSP Reporting

  • Self-insured clients using TPAs have direct reporting obligations under the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) Act.
  • Ensure you understand who (you, the TPA, or the client) is responsible for Section 111 reporting.

WCMSA Submissions

  • When dealing with workers’ compensation claims for self-insured clients using TPAs, be clear on the process for WCMSA submissions and approvals.
  • Remember, the self-insured entity is ultimately responsible for ensuring compliance.

6. Communication Challenges

Multiple Stakeholders

  • When working with clients using TPAs, you may need to communicate with the TPA, the client, and sometimes the client’s broker or consultant.
  • Clear communication channels and protocols are essential.

Client Education

  • Be prepared to educate self-insured clients using TPAs on claims processes and legal requirements more frequently than you would with an experienced insurance company.

7. Data Security and Privacy

Client-Specific Requirements

  • Clients using TPAs may have stricter data security requirements than standard insurance companies.
  • Familiarize yourself with any specific data handling and privacy protocols.

8. Performance Metrics

Client-Specific KPIs

  • Clients using TPAs often have their own Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for claims handling.
  • These may differ from standard insurance industry metrics.

Regular Reviews

  • Expect more frequent performance reviews and audits of your claim files when working with self-insured clients.

9. Litigation Management

Direct Client Involvement

  • Self-insured clients using TPAs may want more direct involvement in litigation strategy and settlement negotiations.
  • Be prepared for additional layers of approval in litigated claims.

10. Cost Control Measures

Heightened Scrutiny

  • clients using TPAs often scrutinize expenses more closely than traditional insurers.
  • Be prepared to justify your activities and any external expenses (e.g., independent medical exams, surveillance) in detail.

Conclusion

Adjusting claims for self-insured clients using TPAs requires a unique skill set. You’ll need to be more flexible, communicate more frequently, and potentially juggle competing priorities between the TPA and the self-insured client. However, this configuration also offers opportunities for more personalized service and the chance to develop deep, specialized knowledge of specific industries or risk types.

Remember, your role is critical in helping self-insured clients using TPAs manage their risk effectively. By understanding these unique aspects and adapting your approach accordingly, you can provide exceptional service and add significant value to both the TPA and the self-insured client.

Stay informed, be proactive in your communication, and don’t hesitate to seek clarification when needed. Your expertise and attention to these nuances will make you an invaluable asset in the complex world of claims management for self-insured clients using TPAs.

Citations

  • Online Source: Self-Insurance Institute of America. (2023). “What is Self-Insurance?
  • Book: Rejda, G. E., & McNamara, M. J. (2017). Principles of Risk Management and Insurance (13th ed.). Pearson. Chapter 8: “Self-Insurance and Third-Party Administrators”
  • Journal Article: Smith, J. L., & Brown, R. K. (2019). “The Role of Third-Party Administrators in Self-Insured Employee Benefit Plans.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 86(2), 457-479.
Scroll to Top